Abstract: The global transition toward renewable energy systems and decarbonization often referred to as the “green transition”—relies heavily on rare-earth minerals that are essential for technologies such as batteries, wind turbines, and solar panels. Although this transition offers substantial environmental and economic advantages for industrialised economies, it has also generated new geopolitical dynamics and patterns resembling neo-colonial resource extraction in the Global South. This paper examines the environmental, economic, and legal implications of rare-earth mineral exploitation, focusing on the asymmetric power relations, labour practices, and ecological consequences that disproportionately affect producing countries. It further analyses governance approaches, international regulatory frameworks, and policy interventions to promote equitable and sustainable management of critical mineral resources.

1. Introduction: Green transition is a key part of global climate mitigation strategies. But its material foundation the rare-earth minerals lithium, cobalt, and neodymium is found mainly in a few Global South countries. These include the Democratic Republic of Congo, Chile, and Madagascar.

This research explores several key questions:

1. How global demand for rare-earth minerals shapes patterns of economic dependency and geopolitical influence.
2. Whether current extraction practices replicate or reinforce neo-colonial structures of resource exploitation.
3. What legal and policy mechanisms can promote environmental justice, economic sovereignty, and sustainable resource governance?

In summary, the study frames rare-earth mineral extraction within broader debates about resource colonialism, development justice, and global governance to clarify the context of these arguments.

2. Conceptual Framework

The worldwide shift to low-carbon energy systems is called the green transition. It has changed the geopolitical and economic importance of some natural resources. Technologies such as electric vehicles, wind turbines, and renewable energy storage depend heavily on critical minerals. Many of these are found in only a few countries. This conceptual framework clarifies three main arguments: the strategic significance of critical minerals, the potential for neo-colonial resource relationships, and the legal and ethical challenges of mineral extraction.

2.1 Green Transition and Critical Minerals: The green transition is the shift from fossil fuels to renewable and low-carbon alternatives such as solar, wind, and electric mobility. However, these technologies are highly material-intensive and require large amounts of specialised minerals.

For instance:

• Lithium and cobalt are crucial for batteries used in electric vehicles.
• Rare-earth elements such as neodymium are essential components in the magnets used in wind turbines.
• Nickel and manganese are important elements in advanced battery technologies.

Institutions such as the International Energy Agency expect a dramatic rise in demand for these minerals in the coming decades. This will happen as governments build more renewable energy infrastructure. Companies such as Tesla use lithium-ion batteries made with lithium, cobalt, and nickel to manufacture electric vehicles. As more people worldwide adopt electric vehicles, competition for these resources has grown rapidly. The importance of critical minerals extends beyond economics. It also affects energy security, industrial policy, and international relations. Governments want dependable supply chains for technologies that enable decarbonization.

2.2 Neo-Colonialism and Resource Dependency: Rising global demand for critical minerals has renewed debates about neo-colonial economic structures. Neo-colonial theory holds that formal colonialism may have ended, but structural power imbalances still allow wealthy countries to influence resource-rich regions. Kwame Nkrumah and others argue that neo-colonialism operates through global trade, foreign investment, and multinational corporate influence.

Neo-colonial dynamics may appear in critical minerals markets. Developing countries often export raw materials. Meanwhile, advanced economies control refining, technology, and final manufacturing. Resource dependency represents a major structural risk for economies heavily reliant on the export of a handful of commodities:

• limited diversification of domestic industries
• reduced bargaining power in international trade negotiations
• Countries that export raw minerals, but do not develop refining or manufacturing, gain little of the total supply chain value.

These dynamics raise concerns about the green transition. Despite its benefits, it could preserve global inequalities in resource management and economic growth.

2.3 Legal and Ethical Dimensions

Extracting and trading critical minerals depends on a complex web of international law, investment deals, and trade rules. Many mining projects involve foreign investment protected under bilateral investment treaties that provide legal safeguards for multinational corporations operating abroad. While such agreements can encourage investment, they may also limit host governments’ regulatory autonomy. At the same time, ethical concerns associated with mineral extraction have received increasing global attention.

Key issues include:

Labour Conditions: Mining in several regions has been linked to unsafe work and exploitation. Artisanal cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo raises concerns due to child labour and dangerous conditions.

Environmental Impacts: Mining can cause severe environmental damage, including deforestation, water pollution, and soil contamination. For example, lithium mining in Chile’s Atacama Desert has raised worries about water use and sustainability.

Community Displacement: Large mining projects may force community relocation or disrupt traditional land use. Indigenous groups in some countries have challenged operations that threaten land rights.

Unequal Revenue Distribution: Even when mineral mining generates significant revenue, profits often go to local elites, foreign investors, or corporations rather than the wider population.

These ethical issues show the need for responsible governance that balances development, environmental protection, and social justice.

3. Global Supply Chains and Geopolitical Dynamics

Critical mineral supply chains depend on where minerals are, industrial capacity, and international competition. Because many minerals are located in only a few countries, global markets rely on a small group of producers.

3.1 Concentration of Mineral Reserves

Critical mineral supply chains are defined by reserves clustering in certain locations.

For example:

• The Democratic Republic of the Congo produces more than half of the world’s cobalt supply.
• Chile and Australia rank among the largest producers of lithium.
• China dominates the global processing and refining of many rare-earth elements.

This heavy concentration causes several strategic problems for importing countries.

First, supply disruptions stemming from instability, export restrictions, or logistical constraints can threaten renewable energy production worldwide.

Second, producing countries may gain strategic leverage in international negotiations by controlling critical resources.

Third, a concentrated market can increase price swings and complicate planning for manufacturers and policymakers.

As a result, many industrialised countries have begun developing strategies to diversify supply chains and reduce reliance on single suppliers.

3.2 Corporate and State Actors

Critical mineral supply chains involve many corporate and government players. Major mining firms often run large projects and sometimes partner with local governments. These companies may control key parts of the chain, such as mining, refining, and distribution. Governments in industrialized countries now see critical minerals as strategic resources. These are essential for national economic security. For instance, the U.S. and the EU have policies to secure steady supplies of lithium, cobalt, and rare earths.

These policies may include:

• financial incentives supporting domestic mining and processing
• strategic mineral stockpiles
• diplomatic partnerships with resource-producing countries

Such initiatives strengthen supply security but may pressure producing countries to adopt investment conditions favouring foreign corporations.

3.3 Power Asymmetries

Despite strong global demand for critical minerals, the distribution of economic benefits along supply chains often reflects substantial power asymmetries. Historically, resource-exporting countries in the Global South have frequently received limited economic benefits compared with the value generated by downstream manufacturing and technological innovation.

Several structural factors contribute to this imbalance:

• limited domestic refining and manufacturing capabilities
• dependence on foreign investment and technical expertise
• unequal bargaining power in international trade negotiations

For instance, although cobalt extracted in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is essential for battery production, most refining and manufacturing processes occur elsewhere, particularly in industrialised economies or in processing hubs such as China.

Consequently, resource-producing countries often capture only a small share of the total economic value created within global supply chains.

These dynamics resemble historical patterns of resource extraction associated with colonial and post-colonial economic systems, raising concerns that the global green transition could unintentionally reproduce existing inequalities.

The conceptual framework, therefore, highlights several key themes:

• The strategic importance of minerals for renewable technologies
• The potential emergence of neo-colonial resource relationships
• legal and ethical challenges related to mineral extraction
• geopolitical competition over supply security
• persistent inequalities within global supply chains

Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing policies that ensure the green transition remains not only environmentally sustainable but also socially equitable and geopolitically balanced.

4. Environmental and Social Impacts

The rapid expansion of renewable energy technologies has significantly increased global demand for critical minerals. While these resources are indispensable for the green transition, their extraction often produces substantial environmental and social consequences, particularly in resource-rich regions of the Global South.

4.1 Ecological Degradation

Mining operations frequently generate severe environmental damage, with impacts that may persist for decades.

Key ecological consequences include:

• Deforestation: Mining activities often require clearing large areas of forest, disrupting ecosystems and reducing biodiversity. Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been linked to forest loss in environmentally sensitive regions.
• Water contamination: Mining processes often produce tailings that contain heavy metals and other chemicals, which may seep into rivers and groundwater. Lithium extraction in the Atacama Desert in Chile has raised concerns regarding water scarcity for local agriculture and communities.
• Soil erosion and land degradation: Open-pit mining and surface excavation disrupt soil structures, rendering land unsuitable for agriculture and increasing sediment accumulation in river systems.
• Toxic waste from rare-earth extraction: Processing rare-earth minerals often produces radioactive and chemically hazardous waste. Local communities frequently bear the burden of environmental remediation, while multinational corporations may avoid long-term environmental responsibility.

The cumulative effect of these impacts can undermine the ecological sustainability of mining regions, creating difficult trade-offs between global green energy objectives and local environmental protection.

4.2 Labour and Human Rights

The extraction of critical minerals also raises serious labour and human rights concerns.

• Child labour and unsafe conditions: Artisanal cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been widely documented to involve child labour and dangerous working environments, including exposure to toxic dust and significant physical hazards.
• Low wages and labour exploitation: Many workers in mining operations receive minimal wages despite performing labour-intensive, hazardous work.
• Regulatory weaknesses: In countries with limited labour oversight or widespread corruption, mining companies may operate with minimal accountability, exacerbating social inequality and injustice.

These issues not only violate fundamental human rights standards but also create reputational risks for corporations and importing countries that rely on these minerals for renewable technologies.

4.3 Community Displacement and Cultural Impact

Large-scale mining projects frequently require land acquisition and relocation, disproportionately affecting indigenous and rural populations.

• Displacement: Communities may be forced to leave ancestral lands, losing access to housing, farmland, and local infrastructure.
• Loss of livelihoods: Mining operations can undermine traditional economic activities, such as farming, fishing, and artisanal trade, thereby increasing vulnerability among affected populations.
• Cultural erosion and social tensions: Displacement disrupts community cohesion and traditional cultural practices, intensifying socio-economic inequality and generating long-term social tensions.

For example, lithium mining in Bolivia’s Salar de Uyuni has raised concerns regarding its impact on indigenous communities whose livelihoods depend on salt harvesting and local agricultural practices.

5. Legal and Policy Dimensions

The environmental and social consequences of critical mineral extraction are shaped by international law, domestic regulations, and global governance frameworks. Addressing these challenges necessitates coordinated legal mechanisms that reconcile investment promotion, developmental objectives, and human rights protections.

5.1 International Trade and Investment Law

Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and trade agreements exert significant influence over mining practices:

• Investor protections: BITs often provide foreign corporations with safeguards, including dispute resolution mechanisms and compensation for expropriation. While these provisions attract investment, they may constrain host governments’ ability to enforce environmental and labour standards.
• Weak environmental clauses: Many treaties lack binding social or ecological obligations, leaving local communities vulnerable to exploitation.
• Trade asymmetries: Developed importing countries frequently possess greater leverage in negotiating favourable treaty terms, reinforcing historical patterns of dependency.

For instance, disputes arising under investor-state arbitration frameworks have occasionally contested environmental regulations imposed by host nations, highlighting tensions between protecting foreign investment and upholding social-ecological responsibilities.

5.2 National Regulatory Frameworks

States face a delicate trade-off between attracting foreign investment and safeguarding sovereignty over natural resources:

• Resource nationalism: Some countries, such as Chile in its lithium sector, emphasise retaining domestic benefits through royalties, taxation, or state-owned enterprises.
• Liberalised extractive regimes: Other states adopt open investment policies to attract multinational corporations, often at the expense of local labour and environmental standards.
• Effective regulation requirements: Transparent licensing procedures, clear royalty schemes, and environmental safeguards are essential to ensure equitable distribution of benefits and minimise ecological and social harm.

Strong national frameworks can ensure that critical mineral extraction contributes to sustainable development rather than perpetuating dependency or structural inequalities.

5.3 Global Governance Mechanisms

Several international initiatives aim to enhance accountability and responsible practices in extractive industries:

• Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI): Promotes disclosure of revenues from mining companies to ensure that governments and local communities benefit from resource wealth.
• UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Provide frameworks for corporate responsibility in respecting human rights and mitigating adverse impacts.
• Sustainability certification schemes: Initiatives such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative track minerals from source to end-use, reducing the likelihood of labour or environmental abuse.

However, these mechanisms are often voluntary or inconsistently implemented, limiting their practical impact. Without robust enforcement and integration into domestic law, global governance frameworks may fail to adequately mitigate the environmental and social costs of critical mineral extraction.

In summary, the environmental and social dimensions of critical mineral extraction present complex trade-offs:

• Mining supports the green transition but generates ecological damage, labour exploitation, and community displacement.
• International treaties and national regulations can either protect or compromise local interests, depending on enforcement and design.
• Global governance mechanisms offer accountability frameworks, yet voluntary compliance and weak enforcement limit their effectiveness.

Comprehending these dynamics is essential for policies that ensure the green transition is environmentally sustainable, socially just, and geopolitically responsible.

6. Neo-Colonial Implications

While the green transition is indispensable for decarbonization, it carries unintended socio-economic and geopolitical consequences for resource-rich countries in the Global South. Patterns of extraction and global demand risk replicating structures reminiscent of neo-colonial economic relations.

6.1 Export-Dependent Economies and Structural Inequalities

Many mineral-producing countries remain heavily dependent on the export of raw materials such as cobalt, lithium, and rare-earth elements. While these exports generate revenue, much of the economic value is captured by multinational corporations and importing nations that control refining, manufacturing, and technological development.

For example:

• The Democratic Republic of the Congo supplies over 60% of global cobalt, yet captures a relatively small proportion of the total value added in battery production.
• Multinational corporations based in industrialised nations often negotiate favourable terms in export contracts, constraining domestic economic benefits.

This dynamic mirrors historical patterns of colonial resource extraction, where raw materials flowed from colonies to industrial powers, creating wealth for foreign elites while local populations endured social, economic, and environmental costs.

6.2 Peripheral Lock-In through Technology-Driven Demand

The rapid growth of technologies requiring critical minerals—including electric vehicles, batteries, and renewable infrastructure—creates structural dependencies:

• Resource-rich countries may focus on raw extraction without developing domestic refining or technological capabilities.
• Global industrial hierarchies are reinforced, maintaining these countries in peripheral positions within value chains.

For instance, while lithium reserves in Chile, Bolivia, and Argentina are crucial to the global battery market, most high-value battery production occurs in industrialised economies, particularly in China, South Korea, and the European Union. This constrains resource-producing nations from capturing long-term economic benefits from their natural wealth.

6.3 Environmental Burdens and Justice

Environmental degradation from mining disproportionately affects producing countries, raising issues of climate and environmental justice:

• Mining operations consume significant water resources, pollute soil and waterways, and disrupt ecosystems.
• Local communities bear the costs of land degradation, biodiversity loss, and exposure to toxic waste.
• Meanwhile, industrialised importing nations accrue benefits from these environmental externalities.

For instance, lithium extraction in the Atacama Desert in Chile has reduced water availability for indigenous communities and local agriculture, while batteries produced from these minerals are exported globally. Such spatial inequities highlight the mismatch between global benefits and local environmental costs, raising ethical and policy questions regarding responsibility in the green transition.

7. Policy Recommendations

Mitigating neo-colonial dynamics in critical mineral extraction requires coordinated policies at both national and international levels that balance economic development, environmental sustainability, and social equity.

7.1 Resource Sovereignty and Fair Trade

States should assert domestic control over extraction terms, royalties, and contractual agreements to maximise benefits from their natural resources:

• Governments can negotiate higher royalty rates, production-sharing agreements, or local content requirements.
• Ensuring fair trade and equitable contract terms reduces dependence on multinational corporations and foreign investors.

For example, Botswana’s diamond industry illustrates how strategic resource governance can retain domestic benefits while fostering long-term economic stability.

7.2 Sustainable Mining Standards

Implementation of environmental and labour regulations aligned with international best practices is essential:

• Protect ecosystems from deforestation, water pollution, and soil degradation.
• Ensure safe working conditions, fair compensation, and the elimination of child labour.

Standards can draw on frameworks such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights or the Responsible Minerals Initiative, which provide benchmarks for corporate accountability in extractive sectors.

7.3 Local Value Addition

Promoting domestic refining, processing, and technology development enables producing nations to capture greater economic value:

• Lithium can be processed into battery-grade materials domestically rather than exported as raw brine or ore.
• Investment in local battery manufacturing, renewable technology components, and downstream industries fosters employment and technological capacity.

Such strategies reduce reliance on foreign markets and strengthen industrial diversification.

7.4 Transparency and Accountability

Institutional mechanisms for reporting social, environmental, and financial impacts are critical:

• Regular disclosure of revenues, remediation activities, and labour conditions build public trust.
• Independent monitoring bodies, community engagement, and oversight civil society ensure compliance.

Initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) should be strengthened and mandated to avoid reliance on voluntary reporting alone.

7.5 International Cooperation

The global nature of critical mineral supply chains necessitates multilateral frameworks to balance the interests of importing and producing countries:

• Industrialised nations should collaborate with resource-rich states to ensure equitable benefit distribution and sustainable extraction practices.
• Policies may include technology transfer agreements, joint investments in local refining infrastructure, and harmonised environmental standards.

For example, the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act aims to diversify supply chains while fostering sustainable mining practices and partnerships with exporting countries.

If neglected, the green transition risks perpetuating neo-colonial patterns:

• Export dependency reinforces structural inequalities, with local communities bearing costs while foreign actors capture benefits.
• Limited domestic value addition maintains peripheral positions in global supply chains.
• Environmental impacts are disproportionately borne by producing states, raising issues of equity and justice.

Policy interventions including resource sovereignty, sustainable mining standards, local value addition, transparency, and international cooperation are essential to ensure the green transition is environmentally sustainable and socially equitable.

8. Future Research Directions

The interaction of critical mineral extraction, global supply chains, and socio-environmental impacts generates a robust research agenda crucial for shaping sustainable and equitable policies.

8.1 Comparative Governance Studies

Future studies should analyse mining governance across Latin America, Africa, and Asia:

• Latin America (e.g., lithium in Chile, Argentina, Bolivia) emphasises resource nationalism and environmental safeguards.
• Africa (e.g., cobalt in the Democratic Republic of the Congo) faces labour challenges, weak enforcement, and corporate dominance.
• Asia (e.g., rare-earth elements in China) combines state-directed industrial policy with control over global supply chains.

Comparative analysis can identify best practices, institutional gaps, and governance models balancing economic, social, and environmental objectives.

8.2 Quantitative Assessment of Environmental and Social Costs

Rigorous measurement of ecological and human impacts is necessary:

• Life-cycle assessments can quantify deforestation, water consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and pollution.
• Social impact assessments can track labour exploitation, displacement, and socio-economic inequality.
• Integrated metrics inform policy design and corporate sustainability strategies

For example, analysing water use in lithium brine extraction in the Atacama Desert alongside community socio-economic data to guide equitable resource management.

8.3 Policy Simulation Models for Equitable Benefit-Sharing

Simulation models allow policymakers to evaluate alternative revenue distribution and value-addition strategies:

• Models can compare scenarios for domestic refining, technology transfer, and royalty frameworks.
• Outcomes can guide negotiations between governments, investors, and civil society.
• Quantitative approaches enable transparent evaluation of trade-offs between economic, environmental, and social objectives, especially in resource-dependent economies where long-term planning is critical.

8.4 Ethical Frameworks Integrating Justice, Sovereignty, and Responsibility

Research should advance normative frameworks for resource governance:

• Incorporate environmental justice to prevent disproportionate burdens on local communities.
• Uphold economic sovereignty to allow producing countries to capture greater resource value.
• Recognise global climate responsibility, ensuring decarbonization does not exploit vulnerable populations.

Such frameworks can guide legal reform, corporate social responsibility, and international cooperation to balance global sustainability with local equity.

9. Conclusion

The global green transition, while essential for climate mitigation, introduces new geopolitical, social, and ethical challenges:

• Extraction of rare-earth and critical minerals exposes Global South countries to resource dependency, labour exploitation, and environmental degradation, even as industrialised nations secure strategic advantages in renewable technologies.
• These dynamics risk replicating historical patterns of neo-colonial extraction, in which wealth is exported while local burdens persist.

Addressing these asymmetries requires:

1. Robust governance and legal reform: Strengthening domestic regulations, labour standards, environmental protections, and equitable contracts.
2. International cooperation: Multilateral frameworks and fair trade mechanisms to ensure shared benefits and enforce sustainability standards.
3. Integration of local and global interests: Policies must reconcile the priorities of producing communities, national development, and global climate imperatives.

Neglecting these measures risks perpetuating structural inequalities, undermining both social justice and long-term sustainability goals. Ultimately, a truly sustainable and equitable energy transition demands a holistic approach that addresses environmental, socio-economic, and geopolitical dimensions simultaneously, ensuring that the global fight against climate change does not reproduce historical patterns of exploitation under a new guise.

References:

1. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Migration, Refugee Law & Border Governance in Europe and the United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809879
2. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). SECULARISM, ATHEISM, AND THEISM IN BANGLADESH: HISTORICAL EVOLUTION, SOCIAL DYNAMICS, AND CONTEMPORARY DEBATES. 10.5281/zenodo.16790798.
3. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Future Bangladesh: 31-Point Agenda for Change (বিএনপির ৩১ দফা) Vol-I.
4. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Future Bangladesh: 31-Point Agenda for Change (বিএনপির ৩১ দফা) Vol-II.
5. Shah, J. (2026). Evaluating the Philosophical Necessity of a “Constitutional Right to Mental Privacy”. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19716905
6. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Evaluating the Philosophical Necessity of a “Constitutional Right to Mental Privacy”. Journal of Constitutional and Governance Studies. 4. 10.5281/zenodo.19716905.
7. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2026). Freedom-Restricting Harassment and Emotional Integrity. Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom. 2.
8. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Fisheries Regulation and Coastal Sustainability: Legal Frameworks, Environmental Protection, and Sustainable Resource Management. Mantis Journal of Fisheries. 2.
9. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2026). Evaluating Corporate Liability for Tax Evasion under the UK’s Economic Crime Reforms. World Tax Journal. 8. 10.5281/zenodo.19701541.
10. Shah, J. (2026). Shah’s Note: Hobbes, Locke & Rousseau in Modern Politics. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19463418
11. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2026). Digital Services Taxes and Trade Law Conflicts. GLOBAL DIGITAL. 4. 10.5281/zenodo.19701497.
12. Shah, J. (2026). BRICS+ and Alternative Global Sovereignty. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19546263
13. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Big Tech and Constitutional Counter-Power. CONSTITUO Journal of State and Political Law Research. IV. 10.5281/zenodo.19423715.
14. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Access to Education and Social Justice Law: A Legal and Policy Analysis. Education Landscapes. 6. 10.5281/zenodo.19156011.
15. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutional Interpretation: A Comparative Study of Originalism and Living Constitution Theories. CONSTITUO Journal of State and Political Law Research. 10.5281/zenodo.17498100.
16. Shah, J. (2026). Analyzing the Political Legitimacy of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) as Sovereign Entities. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19301761
17. Shah, J. (2026). A Jurisprudential Analysis of Court-Made Law and National Legal Authority. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19121615
18. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Algorithmic Power and the Reconfiguration of Global Political Economy in Post- Human Administrative Systems.
19. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Islamic Personal and Political Philosophy. Journal on Islamic Studies. II. 10.5281/zenodo.19103843.
20. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Removing Constitutional Crisis: Legitimate Institutional Solutions for Democratic Stability. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19058166
21. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Electoral Integrity and Democratic Legitimacy: Safeguarding Free and Fair Elections in the Modern Era. Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy. 8.
22. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). What is Law?. Law Journal. 10.5281/zenodo.18778395.
23. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Long-Term Justice Implications of Intergenerational Algorithmic Forecasting. International Review of Law Computers & Technology. 3.
24. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Century-Scale Ethics of Autonomous Decision Systems: Toward Deep-Time Models of AI Governance. Global Journal of Law AI & Ethics.
25. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). When Giants Fuck the Rules: Power, Impunity, and the Crisis of International Law. Public international and private international law. 2.
26. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Philosophy for Gen-Z and Gen-Alpha: A New Conceptual Framework. Philosophy of Education. 10.5281/zenodo.18820162.
27. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Migration, Refugee Law & Border Governance in Europe and the United Kingdom. Journal of Migration and Political Studies. 10.5281/zenodo.18809879.
28. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Democratic Backsliding & Constitutional Erosion in Bangladesh. Journal of Law and Corruption Review. 10.5281/zenodo.18795233.
29. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Anti-Corruption & Transparency in Southeast Asia. MATAKAO Corruption Law Review.
30. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Sovereignty Paradox: Reconciling Popular Sovereignty with Constitutional Constraint. Revista de Ciência Política Direito e Politicas Públicas – POLITI(K)CON. 10.5281/zenodo.18764533.
31. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Shah Jubaer’s Theory on Human Rights-Based Environmental Law. 10.5281/zenodo.18511651.
32. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Academic Freedom and Institutional Law: Legal Foundations, Challenges, and Governance in Higher Education. Special education. III. 10.5281/zenodo.19141135.
33. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Learning from Failure: A Study on Why Certain National Policies Do Not Achieve Their Objectives. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.18444368.
34. Shah Jubaer. (2026). Human Rights Protection in Crisis Situations in Developing Countries. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809820
35. Shah Jubaer. (2026). Judicial Independence and Court Reform in the Modern Era. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18795323
36. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Public Trust Doctrine and the Legal System: Protecting Public Resources Through Law. 10.5281/ZENODO.17353820.
37. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Reimagining Democracy in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Participatory Governance and Institutional Accountability. 10.5281/zenodo.17363785.
38. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Shah Jubaer’s Adaptive Governance Theory. 10.5281/zenodo.17388215.
39.  
40. Shah Jubaer. (2026). Democratic Backsliding & Constitutional Erosion in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18795233
41. Shah Jubaer. (2026). What is Law?. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18778395
42. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). From Bismarck to Beveridge: Tracing the Foundations of the Welfare State. 10.5281/zenodo.16730455.
43. Jubaer, Shah. (2023). Islam and Democracy: Compatibility, Contestation, and the Future of Participatory Governance in Muslim-Majority States. Politik Islam. 10.5281/zenodo.17330013.
44. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). The Legal Dimensions of Migration and Refugee Protection in the 21st Century. Journal of Refugee Studies. 10.5281/zenodo.17118059.
45. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Contemporary Socialistic Politics: Pathways to Equality and State Welfare in a Globalized Economy. Marxism & Sciences. 10.5281/zenodo.17298726.
46. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Analyzing the Political Legitimacy of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) as Sovereign Entities. L Humanité. 10.5281/zenodo.19301761.
47. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). CRIMINAL LAW AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF JUSTICE: STRUCTURAL ANALYSES AND PATHWAYS TO REFORM. 10.5281/zenodo.16945334.
48. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). LEGAL HARMONY AND TRANQUIL POLICY. 10.5281/zenodo.16657906.
49. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). POLITICS AS A PROFESSION OF CORRUPTION VS. SOCIAL WORK AS ACADEMIC PURSUIT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BANGLADESH’S GOVERNANCE AND CIVIC CULTURE. 10.5281/zenodo.16860495.
50. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). ISLAMIC ECONOMICS AND CONVENTIONAL ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE STATE DEVELOPMENT. 10.5281/zenodo.16945317.
51. Shah, J. (2026). Carbon Taxes and Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19582537
52. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). BUILDING A SMART CITY IN BANGLADESH: POLICY, GOVERNANCE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTEGRATION. 10.5281/zenodo.16786033.
53. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). The Role of Citizen Journalism: Empowerment and Credibility Challenges. South Asian Journal of Management. 10.5281/zenodo.16860884.
54. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). Shah’s note on the Policies for Energy and Climate Resilience: Building Clean Energy Infrastructure and Incentive Systems in Southeast Asia. 10.5281/zenodo.16547202.
55.  
56. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). WELFARE AT A CROSSROADS: CHALLENGES, REFORMS, AND THE ROAD AHEAD. 10.5281/zenodo.17027857.
57. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Beyond Earth: A Scientific and Strategic Examination of Space Exploration and the Mars Mission. Sci-Tech Journal. 10.5281/zenodo.16465137.
58.  
59. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). The Dynamics of Genius. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18736653
60. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 15th Reform Agenda. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18718329
61. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 14th Reform Agenda. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18718260
62. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Shah Jubaer’s Principle of Ethical-Algorithmic Governance (SJ-PEAG) (Patent). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18676422
63. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 11th Reform Agenda. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18560812
64. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Bangladesh Nationationalist Party: 13th Reform Agenda. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18475442
65. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 10th Reform Agenda. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18475403
66. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Rationality vs. Politics in National Policy Design: Analyzing the Decision-Making Process. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18436778
67. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). The Dynamics of Policy Formulation: How Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Shape State Policies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18407161
68. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (9th) on the Transparent Governance in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18208967
69. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). BNP’s policy reform agenda (8th) on the Commission and Electoral System in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18208895
70. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). BNP’s Policy Reform agenda (3rd) on Reintroduction of a Neutral Caretaker Government System. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18162798
71. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). The Role of Bureaucracy and Expertise in Shaping National Policy Agendas. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17677427
72. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (31st) on Modern Housing and Urbanization in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17655008
73. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (30th) on Bangladesh’s Tech and Energy Future. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17654960
74. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (29th) on Waterway Governance and Climate Adaptation in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17654929
75. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). BNP’S Policy Reform Agenda (28th) on Modernization of Transport and Multimodal Connectivity in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17654881
76. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda ( 27th) on Ensuring Fair Prices Through Farmer Protection in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17654832
77. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17585169
78. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17585111
79. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Tarique Rahman’s Agricultural Development Theory: Empowering Farmers through the Farmer’s Card. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17518189
80. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). A Policy Study of Tarique Rahman’s Curriculum Vision for Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17509243
81. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). ‘Bangladesh First Principle’: Tarique Rahman’s Political Governance Philosophy (Patent). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17509219
82. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Constitutional Interpretation: A Comparative Study of Originalism and Living Constitution Theories. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17498100
83. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Constitutional Identity and the Limits of Constitutional Change. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17451483
84. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Atthobhud. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17308713
85. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Democracy Under Stress: Populism, Constitutionalism, and the Rule of Law. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17317064
86. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Islam and Democracy: Compatibility, Contestation, and the Future of Participatory Governance in Muslim-Majority States. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17330013
87. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Nationalism and Globalization: Reconciling Sovereignty with Transnational Norms. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17330079
88. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Participatory Democracy in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Risks for Political Engagement. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17345288
89. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Public Trust Doctrine and the Legal System: Protecting Public Resources Through Law. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17353820
90. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Reimagining Democracy in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Participatory Governance and Institutional Accountability. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17363785
91. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Shah Jubaer’s Theory of Anticipatory Risk Governance. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17373254
92. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Shah Jubaer’s Adaptive Governance Theory (Patent). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17388215
93. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Contemporary Socialistic Politics: Pathways to Equality and State Welfare in a Globalized Economy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17298726
94. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Digital Transformation in the Justice System: E-Courts, Case Management, and Legal Accessibility. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17127616
95. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). The Legal Dimensions of Migration and Refugee Protection in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17118059
96. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Constitutionalism in Crisis: Analyzing the Erosion of Democratic Norms in Comparative Perspective. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17118031
97. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Balancing National Security and Individual Rights: A Comparative Study of Data Privacy Laws. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17102885
98. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). The Evolution of Cybersecurity Law: Global Approaches to Combating Cybercrime. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17095926
99. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Regulating Autonomous Systems in the Age of Digital Governance. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17095910
100. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). ECONOMY FOR ALL: BUILDING FISCAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A WELFARE STATE. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17074276
101. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Proportional Representation an electoral Fragility in Bangladesh and Asia. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17058925
102. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). WELFARE AT A CROSSROADS: CHALLENGES, REFORMS, AND THE ROAD AHEAD. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17027857
103. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Corruption, Accountability, and Legal Enforcement: Evaluating Anti-Corruption Mechanisms. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16956144
104. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). CRIMINAL LAW AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF JUSTICE: STRUCTURAL ANALYSES AND PATHWAYS TO REFORM. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16945334
105. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Islamic Economics and Conventional Economic Systems: A Comparative Analysis for Sustainable State Development. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16945317
106. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2024). The Strength of BNP’s Unity under Tarique Rahman’s Leadership and the Seeds of the July Revolution. Intellectica Revue De L Association Pour La Recherche Cognitive, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16899135
107. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Diversity and Representation in Newsrooms: A Critical Pillar for Fair Reporting. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16891484
108. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). The Future of Journalism in the AI Era. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16891431
109. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Shaping Perception: The Role of Algorithms in News Consumption and Information Dissemination. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16891266
110. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). The Role of Citizen Journalism: Empowerment and Credibility Challenges. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16860884
111. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). POLITICS AS A PROFESSION OF CORRUPTION VS. SOCIAL WORK AS ACADEMIC PURSUIT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BANGLADESH’S GOVERNANCE AND CIVIC CULTURE. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16860495
112. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2024). SECULARISM, ATHEISM, AND THEISM IN BANGLADESH: HISTORICAL EVOLUTION, SOCIAL DYNAMICS, AND CONTEMPORARY DEBATES. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16790798
113. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Shah’s Note on Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Society: Ethical, Economic, and Social Dimensions of a Technological Transformation. In Intellectism Publisher (Vol. 1, Number 05). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16464851
114. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Beyond Earth: A Scientific and Strategic Examination of Space Exploration and the Mars Mission. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16465137
115. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). Shah’s Note on “Southeast Asia’s Development Dilemma: Democratic Aspirations and Modernization Realities”. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16465300
116. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2024). Shah’s note on the Policies for Energy and Climate Resilience: Building Clean Energy Infrastructure and Incentive Systems in Southeast Asia. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16547202
117. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2024). Shah’s Note on “Bridging the Gaps: A Policy Framework for Integrated Behavioral Health, Substance Abuse Intervention, and Maternal Healthcare Access in Rural Communities”. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16622518
118. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2024). LEGAL HARMONY AND TRANQUIL POLICY. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16657906
119. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). From Bismarck to Beveridge: Tracing the Foundations of the Welfare State. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16730455
120. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2025). BUILDING A SMART CITY IN BANGLADESH: POLICY, GOVERNANCE AND TECHNOLOGICAL INTEGRATION. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16786033
121. Jubaer, S. The Sovereignty Paradox: Reconciling Popular Sovereignty with Constitutional Constraint.
122. Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe, J. (2026). Future Bangladesh: 31-Point Agenda for Change (বিএনপির ৩১ দফা) Vol-II. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19172834
123. Jubaer, S. (2026). SHAH JUBAER’S THEORY ON HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL LAW. Eureka Journal of Humanities and Social Research, 2(1), 128-150.
124. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Access to Justice and Legal Inclusion. Legal Concept. 10.5281/zenodo.19173132.
125. Jubaer, S. The Sovereignty Paradox: Reconciling Popular Sovereignty with Constitutional Constraint.
126. Jubaer, S. (2025). Beyond Earth: A Scientific and Strategic Examination of Space Exploration and the Mars Mission. Sci-Tech Journal, 10.
127. Jubaer, S. The Future of Journalism in the AI Era.
128. Jubaer, S. (2017). An Indispensable Analogy of Specific Performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1877 of Bangladesh. Shah Jubaer. pdf. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences.
129. Jubaer, S. (2021). THE CRIME, CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR, AND EXTENDED CRIMINOLOGY: A CRITICAL SCRUTINY. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research, 8(213221), 10-17605.
130. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. BASIC GUIDELINES TO COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: AN IDEOLOGICAL AND METHODICAL DISCUSSION.
131. Jubaer, S. Anti-Corruption & Transparency in Southeast Asia.
132. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. Research Project on:” An Effective association between the Constitution and Constitutionalism to set up a Constitutional Government.
133. Jubaer, S., & Hoque, L. (2019). The Democracy or a system of elected representation: Analytical affinities and trivialities.
134. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. Notes on the Conflict and choice of Laws.
135. Jubaer, S. Shaping Perception: The Role of Algorithms in News Consumption and Information Dissemination.
136. Jubaer, S. Digital Governance & Regulation of AI in the Gen-Z Era.
137. Jubaer, S. M. O. F., & Hoque, L. (2021). Right Realism and the Realist Criminology: the American Criminologist’s Approach. JournalNX, 7(06), 199-212.
138. Jubaer, S. Evidence-Based Policymaking: Assessing Its Relevance and Application in National Governance Systems.
139. Jubaer, S. Philosophy for Gen-Z and Gen-Alpha: A New Conceptual Framework.
140. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. WELFARE AT A CROSSROADS: CHALLENGES, REFORMS, AND THE ROAD AHEAD.
141. Jubaer, S. M. O. F., & Ahmed, J. Deficiency in Evidence Law Concerning Technological and Expert Support. JournalNX, 7(05), 1-10.
142. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. 21ST CENTURY IS AN ERA OF ISRAELI VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM UNDER LEGAL OBSERVATIONS AND OBLIGATIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
143. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. The Criminal Justice and Forensic Criminology: A Basic Rule.
144. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. The of Artificial intelligence and Isaac Asimov’s three laws of advanced mechanics in the United State of America.
145. Jubaer, S. (2026). Confucianism, Hindu Nationalism, and Islamism: Comparative Political Ideologies in Contemporary Asian States. Chinese Studies in History, 10.
146. Jubaer, S. (2025). The Evolution of Cybersecurity Law: Global Approaches to Combating Cybercrime. Artium Quaestiones, 10.
147. Jubaer, S. (2025). Nationalism and Globalization: Reconciling Sovereignty with Transnational Norms. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 10.
148. Jubaer, S. (2025). Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation. Journal du Conseil-Conseil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mer, 10.
149. Jubaer, S. (2025). Constitutionalism in Crisis: Analyzing the Erosion of Democratic Norms in Comparative Perspective. CONSTITUO Journal of State and Political Law Research, 10.
150. Jubaer, S. (2015). Argument to Legal decisions in terms of establishing criminal justice under the criminal court system of Bangladesh. Criminal law bulletin.
151. Jubaer, S. (2025). Corruption, Accountability, and Legal Enforcement: Evaluating Anti-Corruption Mechanisms. Asian Migrant, 10.
152. Jubaer, S. (2025). Shah Jubaer’s ideological views and his contributions to legal and social‑justice reform in Bangladesh.
153. Hoque, L., Jubaer, S., & Jubaer, S. (2019). Human Rights and the worldwide policy framework: An analytical approach. The International Journal of Human Rights.
154. Jubaer, S. (2025). Bangladesh First Principle’: Tarique Rahman’s Political Governance Philosophy. Intellect XXІ.
155. Jubaer, S. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 16th Reform Agenda. Zenodo.
156. Jubaer, S. (2026). Bangladesh Nationationalist Party: 13th Reform Agenda.
157. Jubaer, S. (2026). The Sovereignty Paradox: Reconciling Popular Sovereignty with Constitutional Constraint. Zenodo.
158. Jubaer, S. (2018). A Plain and sample narration of the Criminology. Criminal Justice Review, 10.
159. Jubaer, S. (2026). The Dynamics of Policy Formulation: How Ideas. Interests, and Institutions Shape State Policies, 10.
160. Jubaer, S. (2025). The Role of Bureaucracy and Expertise in Shaping National Policy Agendas. POLICY RESEARCH, 10.
161. Jubaer, S. (2021). BASIC GUIDELINES TO COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: AN IDEOLOGICAL AND METHODICAL DISCUSSION. 10.17605/OSF. IO/X42KC.
162. Jubaer, S. (2018). Public Interest Litigation and availability of justice in Bangladesh: A legal overview.
163. Jubaer, S. (2017). Legal decisions in terms of the criminal court system. Criminal law bulletin, 10.
164. Jubaer, S. (2016). The ideological Elements and methodical Structure of the constitution of Bangladesh.
165. Jubaer, S. (2020). An Effective association between the Constitution and Constitutionalism to set up a Constitutional Government.
166. Jubaer, S. (2019). The method of findings the Criminal Intention and the consequential outcome of a crime: A basic Guideline towards criminal law practitioners.
167. Jubaer, S. (2018). The rationalization theme, action and Bureaucracy in Socialism.
168. Jubaer, S. (2018). Natural Justice and duty to act fairly under Administrative Law: A comparative discussion.
169. Jubaer, S. (2016). Principles of International Labour Laws adopted in Labour Law of Bangladesh.
170. Jubaer, S. (2018). The specific performance and specific Relief Act.
171. Jubaer, S. (2019). Ideological manifestation of Socialism: Andrew Heywood observation.
172. Jubaer, S. (2018). A basic guidelines to apply Human Rights: comparative approach under comparative constitutional law.
173. Jubaer, S. (2019). The pragmatic morality and principle of Natural Justice: A negative legal construction.
174. Jubaer, S. (2020). Comparative Constitutional Law.
175. Jubaer, S. (2026). Judicial Independence and Court Reform in the Modern Era. Zenodo.
176. Jubaer, S. (2026). Anti-Corruption & Transparency in Southeast Asia. Zenodo.
177. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Ethics Beyond Consensus: Designing AI Normative Frameworks for Pluralistic and Conflict-Prone Societies. The International journal of artificial organs. 3.
178. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). From Data Sovereignty to Algorithmic Sovereignty: Reimagining Global Governance under Intelligent Infrastructure. Trends in Artificial Intelligence.
179. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Silent Compliance: Challenges of Law-Abiding Developing States under Superpower Hegemony. Law & Border. 2.
180. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Structural and Institutional Failures of Politics and Politicians in Bangladesh. Journal of Politics and Democracy. 10.5281/zenodo.18809875.
181. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Human Rights Protection in Crisis Situations in Developing Countries. Journal of Law Human Rights Immigration and Corrections. 10.5281/zenodo.18809820.
182. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Role of Forensic Evidence in Securing Convictions.
183. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Dynamics of Genius.
184. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Idea of a Constitution: Ontology and Normativity in Constitutional Philosophy. Constitution Journal. 10.5281/zenodo.18736459.
185. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy. 10.5281/zenodo.17585111.
186. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutional Identity and the Limits of Constitutional Change. 10.5281/zenodo.17451483.
187. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Rationality vs. Politics in National Policy Design: Analyzing the Decision-Making Process. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.18436778.
188. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Dynamics of Policy Formulation: How Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Shape State Policies. 10.5281/zenodo.18407161.
189. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). The Role of Bureaucracy and Expertise in Shaping National Policy Agendas. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.17677427.
190. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation. Journal du Conseil – Conseil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mer. 10.5281/zenodo.17585169.
191. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Blue Economy and Maritime Governance Laws. 2. 10.5281/zenodo.19433283.
192. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Tarique Rahman’s Agricultural Development Theory: Empowering Farmers through the Farmer’s Card. 10.5281/zenodo.17518189.
193. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence in Legal Systems. 7. 10.5281/zenodo.19377359.
194. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutional Interpretation: A Comparative Study of Originalism and Living Constitution Theories. CONSTITUO Journal of State and Political Law Research. 10.5281/zenodo.17498100.
195. Shah, J. (2026, April 3). Artificial Intelligence, Regulation, and Separation of Powers. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19393305
196. Shah, J. (2026). Climate Change Law and Marine Ecosystems: Legal Frameworks for Ocean Protection in a Changing Climate. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19617110
197. Shah, J. (2026). Climate Governance and the Environmental Rule of Law. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19637248
198. shah, J. (2026). Cosmological Jurisprudence: Toward a Universal Framework of Law. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19637318
199. Shah, J. (2026). Cognitive Liberty and the Law of Torts. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19672867
200. Shah, J. (2026). Cyber Law in Digital Entertainment Platforms. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19672928
201. Shah, J. (2026). Deepfakes, Public Reason, and Consent. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19686920

Shah, J. (2026). Delegating Administrative Adjudication to AI. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19687199